FavoriteLoadingZu den Favoriten hinzufügen

“Society sees nothing because it is kept in a state of deep hypnosis. People have never been so manipulated as they are now. A human being is not given a chance to stop and understand what is happening. Endless series, one more stupid than the other, vulgar pop music, lustful or aggressive films that gently affect the subconscious, cultivate a spirit of selfishness and violence. A normal person quickly becomes an unprincipled animal that leads an absolutely meaningless life.”

Sergei Petrowitsch Kapiza, Russian physicist

"Die Gesellschaft sieht nichts, weil sie in einem Zustand tiefer Hypnose gehalten wird. Noch nie wurden Menschen so manipuliert wie jetzt. Einem Menschen wird keine Chance gegeben, innezuhalten und zu begreifen, was passiert. Endlose Serien, eine dümmer als die andere, vulgäre Popmusik, lustvolle oder aggressive Filme, die sanft auf das Unterbewusstsein einwirken, pflegen einen Geist des Egoismus und der Gewalt. Ein normaler Mensch wird in kurzer Zeit zu einem prinziplosen Tier, das ein absolut bedeutungsloses Leben führt. "

"Общество ничего не видит, потому что его держат в состоянии глубокого гипноза. Никогда ещё народ не был таким тёмным, как сейчас. Человеку не дают шанса остановиться и осмыслить происходящее. Нескончаемые сериалы, один тупее другого, пошлая эстрада, похотливые или агрессивные фильмы, аккуратно воздействуя на подсознание, культивируют дух эгоизма и насилия. Нормальный человек за короткий промежуток времени превращается в беспринципное животное, ведущее абсолютно бессмысленную жизнь."
Сергей Петрович Капица, 9 цитат

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Nützliche und hilfreiche Links

Zitate von Sergey Kapitsa. Aphorismen und Zitate von Peter Kapitsa Sergey Kapitsa Zitate über die Medien

Nothing Found

Sorry, no posts matched your criteria

Frederick Taylor Gates | the people yield themselves with perfect docility

"In our dreams we have limitless resources and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our moulding hand. The present education conventions made from our minds and unhampered by tradition we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive rural folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or of science. We have not to raise up from among them authors, editors, poets or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians, nor shall we cherish even the humbler ambition to raise up from among them lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we now have ample supply. The task which we set before ourselves is a very simple as well as a very beautiful one, to train these people as we find them to a perfectly ideal life just where they are. So we will organize our children into a little community and teach them to do in a perfect way the things their fathers and mothers are doing in an imperfect way, in the homes, in the shop and on the farm."

Frederick Taylor Gates

Rupert Sheldrake | Science delusion is the belief that science …

"Science delusion is the belief that science has already fundamentally understood the nature of our reality and only the details need to be completed. I believe this is a seriously flawed view. Most people's first reaction is one of disbelief and rejection when they first hear this statement. How could there actually be anything more successful than science? It has given us cell phones, computers, airplanes, advanced forms of surgery, and much more. We have huge advantages today through science and through its technical applications. It looks as if there is no more room for error or even delusion there, and yet I maintain that at the innermost core of today's sciences there are fundamental errors of thought and dubious assumptions, and that there is a conflict within the sciences that keeps them from their proper task. I see science as a method of inquiry, a tool for exploring and investigating reality. But there is another side to the sciences, namely science as a worldview or even as a dogmatic belief system. Again, most people are shocked at first when I suggest that science can be a dogmatic belief system. They then say things like, "Hey, science in particular is the only thing that is possible for us and to leave our dogmatic belief patterns. It's the only discipline that produces tangible evidence, full respect, free inquiry, and open thinking." Now, this is the ideal of the sciences, and it is an ideal that I also share. But unfortunately, in practice, this ideal is usually not realized in the way it is preached. Within the sciences there is a strongly defined corset of beliefs that most scientists do not even suspect could be beliefs. They do believe that other people have beliefs-Christians, Buddhists, Muslims, and so on-but they themselves, of course, have no beliefs because they are, after all, concerned with scientific truth. And these beliefs are taken as such settled, established truths that they are usually not even discussed. When you study science, people don't just tell you what beliefs to accept and what things to know. You just absorb these principles like the process of osmosis in biology. These are things that are treated with such a matter of course that you just assume they must be true. Most people outside the scientific world assume that they must be true because science is simply so successful and, as a result, enjoys an enormously high level of prestige today."

Rupert Sheldrake

Richard Feynman | iintellectual tyranny in the name of science

"Science alone of all the subjects contains within itself the lesson of the danger of belief in the infallibility of the greatest teachers in the preceding generation (…) When someone says, “Science teaches such and such,” he is using the word incorrectly. Science doesn’t teach anything; experience teaches it. If they say to you, “Science has shown such and such,” you might ask, “How does science show it? How did the scientists find out? How? What? Where?” It should not be “science has shown” but “this experiment, this effect, has shown.” And you have as much right as anyone else, upon hearing about the experiments–but be patient and listen to all the evidence–to judge whether a sensible conclusion has been arrived at. (…) The experts who are leading you may be wrong. (…) I think we live in an unscientific age in which almost all the buffeting of communications and television-words, books, and so on-are unscientific. As a result, there is a considerable amount of intellectual tyranny in the name of science."

Richard Phillips Feynman